Skip to content
Oddbert
MatchesBest PriceSignalsAI BankrollPricing
Log inGet started
  • Matches
  • Best Price
  • Signals
  • AI Bankroll
  • Pricing
Get startedLog in
Oddbert

Calibrated football probabilities with a public track record. We explain every prediction and never claim a guarantee.

Product

  • Matches
  • Transparency
  • Track record & results
  • Kelly calculator

More

  • Method
  • Pricing
  • Prediction archive
  • Edge radar

Legal

  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of service
18+18+ only

Predictions are probabilities, not guarantees.

StopSpilletROFUS

If gambling stops being fun, get help. Gamble responsibly.

Every prediction is logged before kick-off and scored after the final whistle.© 2026 Oddbert. No affiliate links. No betting accepted. · Weather data from OpenWeather (ODbL).

AC Horsens vs Randers FC prediction

SuperligaSuperliga·Round 11
AC HorsensAC Horsens
19:00
Fri 16 Oct
Prediction T-24h
Randers FCRanders FC

Most likelyRanders FC win · 37%

Best price2.47 Dafabet

PredictionOddsContextMovementDetails

Prediction

36%1AC Horsensmarket 34%
27%XDrawmarket 26%
37%2Randers FCmarket 40%
AC Horsens+1.9 ppDraw+1.2 ppRanders FC-3.1 pp

Market-anchored: consensus (book median) + model lean (max ±3 pp)

These are calibrated probabilities. See how closely they've matched real outcomes

Prediction as of 12 Oct 2026

Odds comparison

Bookmaker decimal odds for this match
BookmakerAC Horsenspays 3% more than the typical bookDrawpays 3% more than the typical bookRanders FCpays 6% more than the typical book
Betano2.773.602.42
Betfair2.753.502.30
Betvictor2.753.402.30
Dafabet2.753.552.47best
Marathonbet2.763.482.35
Onexbet2.773.482.37
Pinnacle2.83best3.60best2.39
Sbo2.623.082.25
William Hill2.753.402.30

Bookmaker names shown for reference only. No affiliate links.

Stake sizer

Two ways to size a hypothetical stake on the model's call — Randers FC at 2.47 (Dafabet).

units

Stays in your browser — never sent to us.

Follow sizing
10.00units

Flat 1% of bankroll — the same rule as our public AI bankroll simulation.

Edge sizing
0 — no edge at this price

Quarter-Kelly at the best listed price, with a hard 5%-of-bankroll cap.

Hypothetical sizing in currency-neutral units, not betting advice. Predictions are probabilities, not guarantees. 18+.

Match context

Strength-adjusted form

AC Horsens

  1. D↑3-3SIL
  2. D↑2-2AAR
  3. L↑0-2FC
  4. W↑5-2SON
  5. L↑2-3VIB

↑ stronger · = even · ↓ weaker opponent

Randers FC

  1. L↑0-2VIB
  2. L=2-4SON
  3. L↓1-2ODE
  4. W↑3-0BRO
  5. W↑2-1AAR

↑ stronger · = even · ↓ weaker opponent

Injuries & absences

AC Horsens

No reported absences.

Randers FC

No reported absences.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Recent form

Recent form — context only, not a tip.

AC Horsens

Goals

Scored / game
1.8last 10
Conceded / game
1.9last 10
xG for / game
1.38last 9
xG against / game
1.65last 9
Clean sheets
0 / 10
BTTS
8 / 10
Over 2.5
7 / 10

Match stats

Corners
3.0last 10
Shots
11.8last 10
Shots on target
4.9last 10
Fouls
16.3last 10
Yellow cards
2.4last 10

Randers FC

Goals

Scored / game
1.1last 10
Conceded / game
1.6last 10
xG for / game
1.06last 10
xG against / game
1.64last 10
Clean sheets
2 / 10
BTTS
4 / 10
Over 2.5
5 / 10

Match stats

Corners
4.0last 10
Shots
10.5last 10
Shots on target
3.4last 10
Fouls
12.1last 10
Yellow cards
1.8last 10

Line movement

AC Horsens—

No line movement recorded yet

Draw—

No line movement recorded yet

Randers FC—

No line movement recorded yet

Under the hood

How the model sees this match — the drivers and, after full-time, how the prediction scored.

Why this prediction

ExplanationAI · grounded

The model leans toward a Randers FC result here, shaped mainly by Defensive xG form (home) and Pi-rating edge. The probabilities come from the model — the prose only narrates them.

The AI writes the prose. It never produces or adjusts a probability — those come only from the model.

How we make these predictions
Top model factors
Defensive xG form (home)2.2924%Pi-rating edge0.2418%What's at stake (away)0.1717%Attacking xG form (home)2.2613%Elo difference (team-tuned home advantage)65.113%Goal drought (away)1.007%

The driver chips attribute the gradient-boosted component of an ensemble whose headline is additionally anchored to the market where a consensus exists — they explain that part of the number, not all of it.