Skip to content
Oddbert
MatchesAsk OddbertBest PriceSignalsFollow the AIAI BankrollPricing
Log inGet started
  • Matches
  • Ask Oddbert
  • Best Price
  • Signals
  • Follow the AI
  • AI Bankroll
  • Pricing
Get startedLog in
Oddbert

Calibrated football probabilities with a public track record. We never promise guarantees.

Product

  • New here? Start here
  • Matches
  • Learn to read odds
  • Transparency
  • Track record & results
  • Kelly calculator

More

  • Method
  • Pricing
  • Prediction archive
  • Edge radar

Legal

  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of service

Display

  • My teams
  • Show the introduction again
18+18+ only

Predictions are probabilities, not guarantees.

StopSpilletROFUS

If gambling stops being fun, get help. Gamble responsibly.

Odds are hidden.
Every prediction is logged before kick-off and scored after the final whistle.© 2026 Oddbert. No affiliate links. No betting accepted. · Weather data from OpenWeather (ODbL).

ADO Den Haag vs Excelsior prediction

EredivisieEredivisie·Round 15
ADO Den HaagADO Den Haag
16:45
Sun 6 Dec
Prediction T-24hUpcoming
ExcelsiorExcelsior

Most likelyADO Den Haag win · 42%

PredictionOddsContextMovementDetails

Oddbert's view

Most likely: ADO Den Haag win

Oddbert gives ADO Den Haag a 42% chance of winning.

42%ADO Den Haag
22%Draw
36%Excelsior

In 100 matches like this, ADO Den Haag would win about 42. In the other 58 or so, ADO Den Haag doesn't win.

Dot chart of 100 matches like this: ADO Den Haag win 42, Draw 22, Excelsior win 36.

  • ADO Den Haag win42
  • Draw22
  • Excelsior win36

Each dot is one match out of 100 like this.

Guess the match

Saves the match under My matches in this browser

Guess the result — no money, no points. After the match you'll see your guess next to Oddbert's chance and the result.

Your guesses are saved in this browser only.

Prediction

42%1ADO Den HaagADO Den Haag win
22%XDrawDraw
36%2ExcelsiorExcelsior win

No bookmaker price at forecast time — model onlyNo bookmaker had priced this match when this forecast was made, so it is our model on its own, with no market check.

These are calibrated probabilities. See how closely they've matched real outcomes

Prediction as of 12 Nov 2026

Guess the match

Saves the match under My matches in this browser

Guess the result — no money, no points. After the match you'll see your guess next to Oddbert's chance and the result.

Your guesses are saved in this browser only.

Odds comparisonBookmaker odds

Odds include the bookmaker's margin.

Words explained:

No price from a Danish-licensed bookmaker yet

We only show prices from bookmakers with a Danish licence (Spillemyndigheden).

Bookmaker names shown for reference only. No affiliate links.Bookmakers' names are here for reference only. We don't link to them.

Bookmaker odds are turned off. You can turn them back on under Display at the bottom of the page.

Stake sizer

No price from a Danish-licensed bookmaker is recorded for this outcome right now, so we size nothing.

Hypothetical sizing in currency-neutral units, not betting advice. Predictions are probabilities, not guarantees. 18+.

Thinking of betting on this match?18+Help and breaks

Oddbert takes no bets and doesn't link to bookmakers.

Gambling comes at a cost. The bookmaker's margin means bettors as a whole lose over time.

At the bookmaker

  • Only bookmakers with a Danish licence may offer betting in Denmark.
  • You must be 18+ and register with MitID.
  • You must set a deposit limit. Choose an amount you can afford to lose.

Even the most likely result, a win for ADO Den Haag (42%), doesn't happen in about 58 of 100 matches like this.

18+Help and breaks

  • StopSpillet: free, anonymous advice on 70 22 28 25
  • ROFUS: exclude yourself from all Danish gambling
  • Check your gambling habits
  • Odds are hidden.

Match context

Strength-adjusted form

ADO Den Haag

  1. W↑3-1SR
  2. L↑0-1PZ
  3. L↑2-3HEE
  4. W↑2-1PE
  5. D↑2-2TEL

↑ stronger · = even · ↓ weaker opponent

Excelsior

  1. L=0-1GAE
  2. L↑0-9TWE
  3. L=0-1FS
  4. L↑0-4HEE
  5. L↑1-5GRO

↑ stronger · = even · ↓ weaker opponent

Injuries & absences

ADO Den Haag

Absence data is not available for this match.

Excelsior

Absence data is not available for this match.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Recent form

Recent form — context only, not a tip.

ADO Den Haag

Goals

Scored / game
1.5last 10
Conceded / game
1.9last 10
xG for / game
1.10last 9
xG against / game
1.84last 9
Clean sheets
0 / 10
BTTS
8 / 10
Over 2.5
7 / 10

Match stats

Corners
3.4last 10
Shots
13.0last 10
Shots on target
4.4last 10
Fouls
14.2last 10
Yellow cards
2.0last 10

Key players

  • E. Rottier2G 4A10 apps
  • N. Thomas4G 1A7 apps
  • Y. Eduardo2G 2A9 apps

Excelsior

Goals

Scored / game
1.1last 10
Conceded / game
2.7last 10
xG for / game
0.99last 10
xG against / game
1.95last 10
Clean sheets
1 / 10
BTTS
5 / 10
Over 2.5
8 / 10

Match stats

Corners
3.6last 10
Shots
9.7last 10
Shots on target
2.9last 10
Fouls
11.0last 10
Yellow cards
1.4last 10

Key players

  • I. Yegoian2G 3A10 apps
  • A. Sliti3G 1A10 apps
  • D. Garden2G 0A9 apps

Line movement

ADO Den Haag—

No line movement recorded yet

Draw—

No line movement recorded yet

Excelsior—

No line movement recorded yet

Under the hood

How the model sees this match — the drivers and, after full-time, how the prediction scored.

Why this prediction

ExplanationSummary

Our forecast favours a ADO Den Haag result here; the model's main factors are Goal drought (away) and Recent form (away). The numbers come from our forecast — the prose only narrates them.

Written from the model's main factors with a fixed template, not by the AI. The probabilities come only from our forecast.

How we make these predictions
Top model factors
Goal drought (away)4.0027%Recent form (away)0.0016%Defensive xG form (away)2.4614%What's at stake (home)0.2611%Expected goals (away)1.339%Away form (away)4.459%

The driver chips attribute the gradient-boosted component of an ensemble whose headline is additionally anchored to the market where a consensus exists — they explain that part of the number, not all of it.