Aston Villa W
Birmingham City WMost likelyAston Villa W win · 45%
Best price2.20 Betfair
Most likely: Aston Villa W win
Oddbert gives Aston Villa W a 45% chance of winning.
In 100 matches like this, Aston Villa W would win about 45. In the other 55 or so, Aston Villa W doesn't win.
Dot chart of 100 matches like this: Aston Villa W win 45, Draw 24, Birmingham City W win 31.
Each dot is one match out of 100 like this.
Guess the result — no money, no points. After the match you'll see your guess next to Oddbert's chance and the result.
Your guesses are saved in this browser only.
Our model vs market
Our blended model differs from the price here. This is our own view, not a validated edge — we show it openly, but we don't claim it beats the market until it has done so out-of-time.
Market-anchored: the market's vig-free price (median of 9 books) + model lean (max ±15 pp)
These are calibrated probabilities. See how closely they've matched real outcomes
Prediction as of 13 Nov 2026
Guess the result — no money, no points. After the match you'll see your guess next to Oddbert's chance and the result.
Your guesses are saved in this browser only.
Odds include the bookmaker's margin.
The highlighted price is the highest among the bookmakers with a Danish licence.
Words explained:
| Bookmaker | Aston Villa Wpays 2% more than the typical book | Drawpays 5% more than the typical book | Birmingham City Wpays 3% more than the typical book |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bet365 | 2.15 | 3.60 | 2.88best |
| Betano | 2.15 | 3.55 | 2.72 |
| Betfair | 2.20best | 3.75best | 2.80 |
| Marathonbet | 2.14 | 3.54 | 2.71 |
Bookmaker names shown for reference only. No affiliate links.Bookmakers' names are here for reference only. We don't link to them.
Bookmaker odds are turned off. You can turn them back on under Display at the bottom of the page.
Two ways to size a hypothetical stake on the model's call — Aston Villa W at 2.20 (Betfair).
Stays in your browser — never sent to us.
Flat 1% of bankroll — the same rule as our public AI bankroll simulation.
Not sized — the model behind this prediction has not beaten the closing market out-of-time (see Transparency). We don't size stakes off an edge we don't claim to have.
Hypothetical sizing in currency-neutral units, not betting advice. Predictions are probabilities, not guarantees. 18+.
Oddbert takes no bets and doesn't link to bookmakers.
Gambling comes at a cost. The bookmaker's margin means bettors as a whole lose over time.
Even the most likely result, a win for Aston Villa W (45%), doesn't happen in about 55 of 100 matches like this.
↑ stronger · = even · ↓ weaker opponent
↑ stronger · = even · ↓ weaker opponent
Absence data is not available for this match.
Absence data is not available for this match.
No previous meetings on record.
Recent form — context only, not a tip.
Player data from 9 of 10 matches
No line movement recorded yet
No line movement recorded yet
No line movement recorded yet
How the model sees this match — the drivers and, after full-time, how the prediction scored.
Our forecast favours a Aston Villa W result here; the model's main factors are Expected goals (home) and Expected goals (away). The numbers come from our forecast — the prose only narrates them.
Written from the model's main factors with a fixed template, not by the AI. The probabilities come only from our forecast.
How we make these predictionsThis is a market-anchored baseline, not our full model: the forecast is mostly the bookmakers' price with the margin removed, plus a small share from our own simple model. The factors above describe that share only. A baseline claims no edge over the market.