Skip to content
Oddbert
MatchesBest PriceSignalsAI BankrollPricing
Log inGet started
  • Matches
  • Best Price
  • Signals
  • AI Bankroll
  • Pricing
Get startedLog in
Oddbert

Calibrated football probabilities with a public track record. We explain every prediction and never claim a guarantee.

Product

  • Matches
  • Transparency
  • Track record & results
  • Kelly calculator

More

  • Method
  • Pricing
  • Prediction archive
  • Edge radar

Legal

  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of service
18+18+ only

Predictions are probabilities, not guarantees.

StopSpilletROFUS

If gambling stops being fun, get help. Gamble responsibly.

Every prediction is logged before kick-off and scored after the final whistle.© 2026 Oddbert. No affiliate links. No betting accepted. · Weather data from OpenWeather (ODbL).

Burnley vs Wolves prediction

ChampionshipChampionship·Round 11·Turf Moor
BurnleyBurnley
21:00
Fri 16 Oct
Prediction T-24h
WolvesWolves

Most likelyWolves win · 41%

Best price2.20 Dafabet

PredictionOddsContextMovementDetails

Prediction

32%1Burnleymarket 30%
27%XDrawmarket 26%
41%2Wolvesmarket 44%
Burnley+2.0 ppDraw+1.0 ppWolves-3.0 pp

Market-anchored: consensus (book median) + model lean (max ±3 pp)

These are calibrated probabilities. See how closely they've matched real outcomes

Prediction as of 12 Oct 2026

Odds comparison

Bookmaker decimal odds for this match
BookmakerBurnleyDrawWolves
Dafabet3.20best3.65best2.20best
Onexbet3.113.502.15

Bookmaker names shown for reference only. No affiliate links.

Stake sizer

Two ways to size a hypothetical stake on the model's call — Wolves at 2.20 (Dafabet).

units

Stays in your browser — never sent to us.

Follow sizing
10.00units

Flat 1% of bankroll — the same rule as our public AI bankroll simulation.

Edge sizing
0 — no edge at this price

Quarter-Kelly at the best listed price, with a hard 5%-of-bankroll cap.

Hypothetical sizing in currency-neutral units, not betting advice. Predictions are probabilities, not guarantees. 18+.

Match context

Strength-adjusted form

Burnley

  1. W=4-0WAT
  2. D=1-1DER
  3. L↑1-3SWA
  4. D↑1-1WRE
  5. L=1-2BC

↑ stronger · = even · ↓ weaker opponent

Wolves

  1. L↑0-1MID
  2. W=1-0WB
  3. W↑1-0SU
  4. D↑2-2BIR
  5. L↑2-4WH

↑ stronger · = even · ↓ weaker opponent

Injuries & absences

Burnley

No reported absences.

Wolves

No reported absences.

Head to head

Burnley 1Draws 1Wolves 0
  • BUR 1-1 WOL
  • WOL 2-3 BUR

Recent form

Recent form — context only, not a tip.

Burnley

Goals

Scored / game
1.4last 10
Conceded / game
1.8last 10
xG for / game
1.23last 10
xG against / game
1.59last 10
Clean sheets
1 / 10
BTTS
9 / 10
Over 2.5
6 / 10

Match stats

Corners
4.8last 10
Shots
14.0last 10
Shots on target
4.6last 10
Fouls
10.5last 10
Yellow cards
1.9last 10

Wolves

Goals

Scored / game
1.7last 10
Conceded / game
1.3last 10
xG for / game
1.73last 10
xG against / game
1.02last 10
Clean sheets
2 / 10
BTTS
7 / 10
Over 2.5
5 / 10

Match stats

Corners
6.0last 10
Shots
15.1last 10
Shots on target
4.1last 10
Fouls
13.0last 10
Yellow cards
1.3last 10

Venue

Venue
Turf Moor, Burnley

Line movement

Burnley—

No line movement recorded yet

Draw—

No line movement recorded yet

Wolves—

No line movement recorded yet

Under the hood

How the model sees this match — the drivers and, after full-time, how the prediction scored.

Why this prediction

ExplanationAI · grounded

The model leans toward a Wolves result here, shaped mainly by What's at stake (home) and Elo difference (team-tuned home advantage). The probabilities come from the model — the prose only narrates them.

The AI writes the prose. It never produces or adjusts a probability — those come only from the model.

How we make these predictions
Top model factors
What's at stake (home)0.0228%Elo difference (team-tuned home advantage)-11.818%Home advantage (team-tuned)18.914%Attacking xG form (away)1.5113%What's at stake (away)0.089%Attacking xG form (home)1.169%

The driver chips attribute the gradient-boosted component of an ensemble whose headline is additionally anchored to the market where a consensus exists — they explain that part of the number, not all of it.