Skip to content
Oddbert
MatchesBest PriceSignalsAI BankrollPricing
Log inGet started
  • Matches
  • Best Price
  • Signals
  • AI Bankroll
  • Pricing
Get startedLog in
Oddbert

Calibrated football probabilities with a public track record. We explain every prediction and never claim a guarantee.

Product

  • Matches
  • Transparency
  • Track record & results
  • Kelly calculator

More

  • Method
  • Pricing
  • Prediction archive
  • Edge radar

Legal

  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of service
18+18+ only

Predictions are probabilities, not guarantees.

StopSpilletROFUS

If gambling stops being fun, get help. Gamble responsibly.

Every prediction is logged before kick-off and scored after the final whistle.© 2026 Oddbert. No affiliate links. No betting accepted. · Weather data from OpenWeather (ODbL).

Chicago Red Stars W vs Seattle Reign FC W prediction

NWSL WomenNWSL Women·Round Group Stage
Chicago Red Stars WChicago Red Stars W
01:00
Mon 19 Oct
Prediction T-24h
Seattle Reign FC WSeattle Reign FC W

Most likelySeattle Reign FC W win · 66%

Best price1.31 Betano

PredictionOddsContextMovementDetails

Prediction

14%1Chicago Red Stars Wmarket 8%
20%XDrawmarket 15%
66%2Seattle Reign FC Wmarket 77%

Our model vs market

Chicago Red Stars W +6.5 ppDraw +4.7 ppSeattle Reign FC W -11.2 pp

Our blended model differs from the price here. This is our own view, not a validated edge — we show it openly, but we don't claim it beats the market until it has done so out-of-time.

These are calibrated probabilities. See how closely they've matched real outcomes

Stale predictionPrediction as of 13 Oct 2026Predictions for this league are paused — this is the last one we made, not a live call.

Odds comparison

Bookmaker decimal odds for this match
BookmakerChicago Red Stars Wpays 9% more than the typical bookDrawpays 6% more than the typical bookSeattle Reign FC Wpays 5% more than the typical book
Betano8.004.901.31best
Betfair8.005.001.25
Betvictor6.504.101.25
Marathonbet8.405.101.24
Onexbet8.90best5.101.25
Pinnacle8.695.24best1.28
William Hill8.504.801.25

Bookmaker names shown for reference only. No affiliate links.

Stake sizer

This prediction is stale (paused league or not refreshed), so we size nothing on it.

Hypothetical sizing in currency-neutral units, not betting advice. Predictions are probabilities, not guarantees. 18+.

Match context

Strength-adjusted form

Chicago Red Stars W

  1. L=0-3DSW
  2. L=1-3NGF
  3. L=0-3WSW
  4. D=1-1PTW
  5. L=0-6NCC

↑ stronger · = even · ↓ weaker opponent

Seattle Reign FC W

  1. L=0-1NCC
  2. W=2-0BLW
  3. L=1-2DSW
  4. L=1-3ACW
  5. W=2-0BFW

↑ stronger · = even · ↓ weaker opponent

Injuries & absences

Chicago Red Stars W

No reported absences.

Seattle Reign FC W

No reported absences.

Head to head

Chicago Red Stars W 2Draws 2Seattle Reign FC W 3
  • SRF 1-0 CRS
  • SRF 3-3 CRS
  • CRS 2-2 SRF
  • SRF 1-2 CRS
  • CRS 2-1 SRF

Recent form

Recent form — context only, not a tip.

Chicago Red Stars W

Goals

Scored / game
0.6last 10
Conceded / game
3.0last 10
Clean sheets
1 / 10
BTTS
4 / 10
Over 2.5
7 / 10

Seattle Reign FC W

Goals

Scored / game
1.1last 10
Conceded / game
0.9last 10
Clean sheets
5 / 10
BTTS
4 / 10
Over 2.5
3 / 10

Line movement

Chicago Red Stars W—

No line movement recorded yet

Draw—

No line movement recorded yet

Seattle Reign FC W—

No line movement recorded yet

Under the hood

How the model sees this match — the drivers and, after full-time, how the prediction scored.

Why this prediction

ExplanationAI · grounded

The model leans toward a Seattle Reign FC W result here, shaped mainly by Expected goals (home) and Expected goals (away). The probabilities come from the model — the prose only narrates them.

The AI writes the prose. It never produces or adjusts a probability — those come only from the model.

How we make these predictions
Top model factors
Expected goals (home)0.6856%Expected goals (away)1.8044%Goal correlation0.120%

The driver chips attribute the gradient-boosted component of an ensemble whose headline is additionally anchored to the market where a consensus exists — they explain that part of the number, not all of it.