Skip to content
Oddbert
MatchesBest PriceSignalsAI BankrollPricing
Log inGet started
  • Matches
  • Best Price
  • Signals
  • AI Bankroll
  • Pricing
Get startedLog in
Oddbert

Calibrated football probabilities with a public track record. We explain every prediction and never claim a guarantee.

Product

  • Matches
  • Transparency
  • Track record & results
  • Kelly calculator

More

  • Method
  • Pricing
  • Prediction archive
  • Edge radar

Legal

  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of service
18+18+ only

Predictions are probabilities, not guarantees.

StopSpilletROFUS

If gambling stops being fun, get help. Gamble responsibly.

Every prediction is logged before kick-off and scored after the final whistle.© 2026 Oddbert. No affiliate links. No betting accepted. · Weather data from OpenWeather (ODbL).

Inter vs Club Brugge KV prediction

UEFA Champions LeagueUEFA Champions League·Round League Stage - 2·San Siro/Giuseppe Meazza
InterInter
21:00
Tue 13 Oct
Prediction T-24h
Club Brugge KVClub Brugge KV

Most likelyInter win · 75%

Best price1.31 Onexbet

PredictionOddsContextMovementDetails

Prediction

75%1Intermarket 78%
16%XDrawmarket 14%
9%2Club Brugge KVmarket 8%
Inter-3.0 ppDraw+1.7 ppClub Brugge KV+1.3 pp

Market-anchored: consensus (book median) + model lean (max ±3 pp)

These are calibrated probabilities. See how closely they've matched real outcomes

Prediction as of 12 Oct 2026

Odds comparison

Bookmaker decimal odds for this match
BookmakerInterpays 5% more than the typical bookDrawpays 9% more than the typical bookClub Brugge KVpays 7% more than the typical book
Bet3651.256.0011.00
Betano1.285.909.75
Betfair1.256.0011.00
Betvictor1.226.5011.50best
Dafabet1.276.4010.00
Marathonbet1.285.9010.75
Onexbet1.31best6.1711.20
Pinnacle1.256.56best10.93
Sbo1.225.518.30
William Hill1.255.509.50

Bookmaker names shown for reference only. No affiliate links.

Stake sizer

Two ways to size a hypothetical stake on the model's call — Inter at 1.31 (Onexbet).

units

Stays in your browser — never sent to us.

Follow sizing
10.00units

Flat 1% of bankroll — the same rule as our public AI bankroll simulation.

Edge sizing
0 — no edge at this price

Quarter-Kelly at the best listed price, with a hard 5%-of-bankroll cap.

Hypothetical sizing in currency-neutral units, not betting advice. Predictions are probabilities, not guarantees. 18+.

Match context

Strength-adjusted form

Inter

  1. W↓3-0PAR
  2. D↓2-2AR
  3. W↓5-3UDI
  4. L=1-2RM
  5. W↓3-2NAP

↑ stronger · = even · ↓ weaker opponent

Club Brugge KV

  1. L↑2-3AV
  2. L↑1-4AM
  3. D↑3-3AM
  4. W↑3-0MAR
  5. W↓4-1KA

↑ stronger · = even · ↓ weaker opponent

Injuries & absences

Inter

No reported absences.

Club Brugge KV

No reported absences.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Recent form

Recent form — context only, not a tip.

Inter

Goals

Scored / game
2.6last 10
Conceded / game
1.4last 10
xG for / game
2.02last 4
xG against / game
0.93last 4
Clean sheets
3 / 10
BTTS
7 / 10
Over 2.5
8 / 10

Match stats

Corners
6.0last 10
Shots
19.8last 10
Shots on target
6.6last 10
Fouls
8.7last 10
Yellow cards
1.4last 10

Club Brugge KV

Goals

Scored / game
1.7last 10
Conceded / game
2.6last 10
xG for / game
1.47last 10
xG against / game
2.33last 10
Clean sheets
1 / 10
BTTS
6 / 10
Over 2.5
10 / 10

Match stats

Corners
3.0last 10
Shots
11.8last 10
Shots on target
5.2last 10
Fouls
10.0last 10
Yellow cards
1.3last 10

Referee profile

Referee
Rohit Saggi
Yellows / game
—
Matches officiated
0

Venue

Venue
San Siro/Giuseppe Meazza, Milan

Line movement

Inter—

No line movement recorded yet

Draw—

No line movement recorded yet

Club Brugge KV—

No line movement recorded yet

Under the hood

How the model sees this match — the drivers and, after full-time, how the prediction scored.

Why this prediction

ExplanationAI · grounded

The model leans toward a Inter result here, shaped mainly by Attacking xG form (home) and Elo difference (team-tuned home advantage). The probabilities come from the model — the prose only narrates them.

The AI writes the prose. It never produces or adjusts a probability — those come only from the model.

How we make these predictions
Top model factors
Attacking xG form (home)8.1822%Elo difference (team-tuned home advantage)33720%Pi-rating edge1.1420%Defensive xG form (home)5.399%League id2.009%What's at stake (away)0.008%

The driver chips attribute the gradient-boosted component of an ensemble whose headline is additionally anchored to the market where a consensus exists — they explain that part of the number, not all of it.