NEC Nijmegen
PSV EindhovenMost likelyPSV Eindhoven win · 66%
Best price1.53 Betano
Most likely: PSV Eindhoven win
Oddbert gives PSV Eindhoven a 66% chance of winning.
In 100 matches like this, PSV Eindhoven would win about 66. In the other 34 or so, PSV Eindhoven doesn't win.
Dot chart of 100 matches like this: NEC Nijmegen win 14, Draw 20, PSV Eindhoven win 66.
Each dot is one match out of 100 like this.
Guess the result — no money, no points. After the match you'll see your guess next to Oddbert's chance and the result.
Your guesses are saved in this browser only.
Our model vs market
Our blended model differs from the price here. This is our own view, not a validated edge — we show it openly, but we don't claim it beats the market until it has done so out-of-time.
Market-anchored: the market's vig-free price (median of 5 books) + model lean (max ±3 pp)
These are calibrated probabilities. See how closely they've matched real outcomes
Prediction as of 13 Nov 2026
Guess the result — no money, no points. After the match you'll see your guess next to Oddbert's chance and the result.
Your guesses are saved in this browser only.
Odds include the bookmaker's margin.
The highlighted price is the highest among the bookmakers with a Danish licence.
Words explained:
| Bookmaker | NEC Nijmegenpays 1% more than the typical book | Drawpays 3% more than the typical book | PSV Eindhovenpays 2% more than the typical book |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bet365 | 5.00 | 4.75 | 1.50 |
| Betano | 5.10 | 4.90best | 1.53best |
| Marathonbet | 5.10best | 4.80 | 1.49 |
Bookmaker names shown for reference only. No affiliate links.Bookmakers' names are here for reference only. We don't link to them.
Bookmaker odds are turned off. You can turn them back on under Display at the bottom of the page.
Two ways to size a hypothetical stake on the model's call — PSV Eindhoven at 1.53 (Betano).
Stays in your browser — never sent to us.
Flat 1% of bankroll — the same rule as our public AI bankroll simulation.
Not sized — the model behind this prediction has not beaten the closing market out-of-time (see Transparency). We don't size stakes off an edge we don't claim to have.
Hypothetical sizing in currency-neutral units, not betting advice. Predictions are probabilities, not guarantees. 18+.
Oddbert takes no bets and doesn't link to bookmakers.
Gambling comes at a cost. The bookmaker's margin means bettors as a whole lose over time.
Even the most likely result, a win for PSV Eindhoven (66%), doesn't happen in about 34 of 100 matches like this.
↑ stronger · = even · ↓ weaker opponent
↑ stronger · = even · ↓ weaker opponent
Absence data is not available for this match.
Absence data is not available for this match.
Recent form — context only, not a tip.
No line movement recorded yet
No line movement recorded yet
No line movement recorded yet
How the model sees this match — the drivers and, after full-time, how the prediction scored.
Our forecast favours a PSV Eindhoven result here; the model's main factors are Pi-rating edge and Elo difference (team-tuned home advantage). The numbers come from our forecast — the prose only narrates them.
Written from the model's main factors with a fixed template, not by the AI. The probabilities come only from our forecast.
How we make these predictionsThe driver chips attribute the gradient-boosted component of an ensemble whose headline is additionally anchored to the market where a consensus exists — they explain that part of the number, not all of it.